[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: xcb only, xft only



At 1190298509 time_t, Sylvain Bertrand wrote:
> What about using only xcb and xft for awesome?

I did not look yet at XCB, but already though to study that.
Same for xft.

I'm still in a 80/20 ratio about rewrite base code/new features
currently, however.

-- 
Julien Danjou
// Λ̊ <julien@xxxxxxxxxxx>   http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx