[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xcb only, xft only
At 1190298509 time_t, Sylvain Bertrand wrote:
> What about using only xcb and xft for awesome?
I did not look yet at XCB, but already though to study that.
Same for xft.
I'm still in a 80/20 ratio about rewrite base code/new features
currently, however.
--
Julien Danjou
// Λ̊ <julien@xxxxxxxxxxx> http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx